Step 5 · straight through

Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.

Better out than in

· original

“We must be entirely honest with somebody if we expect to live long or happily in this world.” (Page 73, Big Book)

Way before Step Five, I spent a lot of time talking to people, to get everything inside me out onto the table.

I don’t think it’s possible to stay sober for long holding anything inside. 

Knowing me, knowing you, knowing Him

· original

“We thank God from the bottom of our heart that we know Him better.” (Page 75, Big Book)

I asked someone what that meant for them. They said: “I completed my Step Five and I wasn’t struck by lightning. I concluded God loves me.”

What’s your experience?

Least said, soonest mended

· original

“But I soon learned that complaining about our oppressions and indignities only makes them loom larger and more disturbing.” (ODAT, 15 March)

If something bad happens, it needs to be mentioned once, in the right way, and to the appropriate person, and that’s the end of it. That’s where Step Five comes in.

Once I’m over it, it can serve as an example of getting over things.

Some rotten things happened during my childhood, but I do not haul them out as badges of identity.

The job is to grow up and toughen up, so that one is bigger than any experience one has.

I’ve dealt with such matters clinically using the Steps, and that’s the end of it.

Things can heal when they’re cleaned up and then left to heal.

Damned-up

· original

“Once we have taken this step, withholding nothing, we are delighted. We can look the world in the eye. We can be alone at perfect peace and ease. Our fears fall from us. We begin to feel the nearness of our Creator.” (Chapter Six, Big Book)

“The dammed-up emotions of years break out of their confinement, and miraculously vanish as soon as they are exposed.” (Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions)

In Spirited Away, the apparent Stink Spirit seems like a disgusting monster until what seems like a small thorn is pulled out of his side, and, as it is pulled out, a mountain of tangled garbage way bigger than him is extracted, he is instantly transformed, and it is revealed he is a river spirit. Thus: us and Step Five.

Death threats IV

· original

There are several points in the Big Book where it is made explicit what the individual must do to avoid drinking and therefore death. Taken together, these constitute the essence of the AA programme, though other elements are presupposed (Step One) or necessary concomitants (Step Ten). The essence can be captured under six headings.

The fourth of these:

STEP FIVE

Secrecy, specifically lack of confession, …

“The best reason first: If we skip [the fifth] step, we may not overcome drinking. Time after time newcomers have tried to keep to themselves certain facts about their lives. Trying to avoid this humbling experience, they have turned to easier methods. Almost invariably they got drunk. Having persevered with the rest of the program, they wondered why they fell. We think the reason is that they never completed their housecleaning. They took inventory all right, but hung on to some of the worst items in stock. … He should realize that we are engaged upon a life-and death errand.” (Chapter 6, Big Book)

Secrets make me cautious, cagey, hypocritical, and, by way of compensation, shrill and self-righteous. All of these separate me from others.

Grosser handicaps

· original

“We pocket our pride and go to it, illuminating every twist of character, every dark cranny of the past.” (Chapter 6, Big Book)

“If you have already made a decision, and an inventory of your grosser handicaps, you have made a good beginning. That being so you have swallowed and digested some big chunks of truth about yourself.” (Chapter 5, ibid.)

Writing a detailed Step Four and getting input on the detail during the process rewires my mind. There is simply not time to cover the detail adequately in a single Step Five conversation.

I proceeded from my first Step Five relieved but with my world of perception and interpretation largely intact.

On the other hand, in a single Step Five conversation, a broad overview helps right-size the past and me, hence the relief.

This is why I practise and advocate both a sponsor’s close involvement in the Step Four writing process and running through a summary in Step Five with a few trusted AA friends.

In this way, both rewiring and right-sizing can be achieved.

Death threats: a tightening up

· original

There are several points in the Big Book where it is made explicit what the individual must do to avoid drinking and therefore death. Taken together, these constitute the essence of the AA programme, though other elements are presupposed (Step One) or necessary concomitants (Step Ten). The essence can be captured under six headings.

UNITY

One cannot recover alone. This is true at the beginning but also after many years. People drift, dangerously, and drifters drink.

“But out of this frightening and at first disrupting experience the conviction grew that A.A.’s had to hang together or die separately.” (Foreword to the Second Edition, Big Book)

RESENTMENT

The link between resentment and drinking is clear: resentment leads to separation from God; separation from God means separation from our source of protection.

“It is plain that a life which includes deep resentment leads only to futility and unhappiness. To the precise extent that we permit these, do we squander the hours that might have been worthwhile. But with the alcoholic, whose hope is the maintenance and growth of a spiritual experience, this business of resentment is infinitely grave. We found that it is fatal. For when harboring such feelings we shut ourselves off from the sunlight of the Spirit. The insanity of alcohol returns and we drink again. And with us, to drink is to die. If we were to live, we had to be free of anger. The grouch and the brainstorm were not for us. They may be the dubious luxury of normal men, but for alcoholics these things are poison.” (Chapter 5, Big Book)

HARMFUL CONDUCT

Lesser known is this item: behaviour that harms others, whether deliberate or unrepentantly permitted, leads to drinking.

“If we are sorry for what we have done, and have the honest desire to let God take us to better things, we believe we will be forgiven and will have learned our lesson. If we are not sorry, and our conduct continues to harm others, we are quite sure to drink. We are not theorizing. These are facts out of our experience.” (Chapter 5, Big Book)

STEP FIVE

Secrecy, specifically lack of confession, likewise.

“The best reason first: If we skip [the fifth] step, we may not overcome drinking. Time after time newcomers have tried to keep to themselves certain facts about their lives. Trying to avoid this humbling experience, they have turned to easier methods. Almost invariably they got drunk. Having persevered with the rest of the program, they wondered why they fell. We think the reason is that they never completed their housecleaning. They took inventory all right, but hung on to some of the worst items in stock. … He should realize that we are engaged upon a life-and death errand.” (Chapter 6, Big Book)

STEP NINE

On this point, there are two specific injunctions plus a couple of illustrative stories. The two injunctions concern amends in general and creditors in particular.

[W]e will never get over drinking until we have done our utmost to straighten out the past. We are there to sweep off our side of the street, realizing that nothing worthwhile can be accomplished until we do so.” (Chapter 6, Big Book)

“We must lose our fear of creditors no matter how far we have to go, for we are liable to drink if we are afraid to face them.” (Chapter 6, Big Book)

“After consulting with his wife and partner he came to the conclusion that it was better to take those risks than to stand before his Creator guilty of such ruinous slander. He saw that he had to place the outcome in God’s hands or he would soon start drinking again, and all would be lost anyhow. He attended church for the first time in many years. After the sermon, he quietly got up and made an explanation. His action met widespread approval, and today he is one of the most trusted citizens of his town. This all happened years ago.” (Chapter 6, Big Book) 

“Some time later, and just as he thought he was getting control of his liquor situation, he went on a roaring bender. For him, this was the spree that ended all sprees. He saw that he would have to face his problems squarely that God might give him mastery. One morning he took the bull by the horns and set out to tell those he feared what his trouble had been. He found himself surprisingly well received, and learned that many knew of his drinking. Stepping into his car, he made the rounds of people he had hurt. He trembled as he went about, for this might mean ruin, particularly to a person in his line of business. At midnight he came home exhausted, but very happy. He has not had a drink since.” (Chapter 11, Big Book)

SPIRITUAL ACTIVITY

The necessity of a spiritual life is arguably less well understood in AA. But even when that fact is acknowledged, the purport is often not understood. Often, prayer and meditation, contemplation, spiritual retreats, and other practices are viewed as the content of the spiritual life. These are not the content but the facilitators; the vessel not the draught. The spiritual life is one of work. The following items are placed in a sequence specifically to illustrate this: the two points of the necessity of a spiritual life for mere survival and the core thereof, namely work with other alcoholics. No work with other alcoholics, no spiritual activity; no spiritual activity, no active relationship with God; no active relationship with God, no mental defence; no mental defence, drinking; drinking, death.

“As to two of you men, whose stories I have heard, there is no doubt in my mind that you were 100% hopeless, apart from divine help.” (Chapter 3)

To be doomed to an alcoholic death or to live on a spiritual basis are not always easy alternatives to face.” (Chapter 4, Big Book)

“Perhaps your husband will make a fair start on the new basis, but just as things are going beautifully he dismays you by coming home drunk. If you are satisfied he really wants to get over drinking, you need not be alarmed. Though it is infinitely better that he have no relapse at all, as has been true with many of our men, it is by no means a bad thing in some cases. Your husband will see at once that he must redouble his spiritual activities if he expects to survive. You need not remind him of his spiritual deficiency—he will know of it.” (Chapter 8, Big Book)

“It is easy to let up on the spiritual program of action and rest on our laurels. We are headed for trouble if we do, for alcohol is a subtle foe. We are not cured of alcoholism. What we really have is a daily reprieve contingent on the maintenance of our spiritual condition. Every day is a day when we must carry the vision of God’s will into all of our activities.” (Chapter 6, Big Book)

“Both saw that they must keep spiritually active. One day they called up the head nurse of a local hospital.” (Chapter 11, Big Book)

“For if an alcoholic failed to perfect and enlarge his spiritual life through work and self-sacrifice for others, he could not survive the certain trials and low spots ahead. If he did not work, he would surely drink again, and if he drank, he would surely die.” (Chapter 1, Big Book)

“All went well for a time, but he failed to enlarge his spiritual life.” (Chapter 3, Big Book)

“Fred would not believe himself an alcoholic, much less accept a spiritual remedy for his problem.” (Chapter 3, Big Book)

“Though the family does not fully agree with dad’s spiritual activities, they should let him have his head. Even if he displays a certain amount of neglect and irresponsibility towards the family, it is well to let him go as far as he likes in helping other alcoholics.” (Chapter 9, Big Book)

“Practical experience shows that nothing will so much insure immunity from drinking as intensive work with other alcoholics. It works when other activities fail.” (Chapter 7, Big Book)

“All of us spend much of our spare time in the sort of effort which we are going to describe.” (Chapter 2, Big Book) 

“Once more: The alcoholic at certain times has no effective mental defense against the first drink. Except in a few rare cases, neither he nor any other human being can provide such a defense. His defense must come from a Higher Power.” (Chapter Three, Big Book)

Step Five: Slap!

· original

I run through the Steps regularly, and, recently, when I was part-way through Step Five, I started laughing, saying, 'This does not paint me in a very good light at all!' My interlocutor said: 'Yes. You've got a lot to work on.' That's the necessary slap.

At the end, he said that he identified with almost 100% on there. I asked which the defect was for which he could say, 'At least I don't do that.' He told me, and I explained what was meant by the defect, and he corrected himself, 'Oh, I do do that.'

The two takeaways:

1. There's a lot to work on.

2. We're all in it together.

Emergency unclogging

· original

The devil uses the four Ds to ensnare:

1. Deception. Lies. Whispered and believed.

2. Division. Separation from others and God.

3. Diversion. Onto other addictions or useless, destructive activities.

4. Discouragement. This feeds back into 1.

To kick-start oneself back on track:

  • Admit, to God, one's abject hopelessness.
  • Affirm, to God, one's trust in God.
  • Ask God for direction and strength in all things.
  • Commit to taking the action indicated.
  • Write an inventory on the present state of mind and conduct.
  • Read it out to five people.
  • Make a list (maybe ten items) of things to do differently (some internal and some external).

For the inventory, maybe pick this. Any list of character defects is good. It avoids the need for inspiration.

Read down the list, and mark up anything that scores a direct hit. Don't fuss or dither. Each item either rings true or it doesn't. You'll know which ones are important. With each hit, write out one example of how that defect is manifesting.

Cap the exercise at one hour.

The most important part of Step Five

· original

Those of us belonging to a religious denomination which requires confession must, and of course, will want to go to the properly appointed authority whose duty it is to receive it. Though we have no religious connection, we may still do well to talk with someone ordained by an established religion. We often find such a person quick to see and understand our problem.

I took Step Five yesterday (with a properly appointed authority). At the end, he asked, 'Is there anything else?'

I looked inside. A couple of things came up. I realise immediately I had covered both, and they dissolved.

And then it was clear: the little wooden box was cleared and entirely empty. There was nothing else. I was aware that all the ego's ammunition had been taken away. There was nothing but me and God.

Of course, the ego will be busy putting little trinkets in the box and is likely already doing so, which is why this process loops. But to get to the point of nothingness: that is the basis on which one then strides into living life solely on the basis of reliance on and service of God.

Step Five: Five Points

· original

If there's a rat in a dark room, you won't find it with a torchlight, because it'll scuttle repeatedly into the dark as you sweep the room. You need to turn on the light so you can see the whole room. Thus with the ego. Step Five: turn on the light to see the whole room, and you'll find the ego.

You don't figure out the jigsaw puzzle picture by looking at the individual pieces. They won't tell you anything. Assemble the pieces, then stand back.

Defects come from ego. Virtues come from God. They are not to be equated. Listing virtues side by side with defects obscures their source, appropriates them as the individual's, diminishes their value, and reduces them to same level as the sordid instruments of the ego. Step Five: defects only.

Defects are muck on one's spectacles and the missteps that flow from such blindness. Virtues are correct sight and actions that flow from that sight.

Keep it to one hour. If you think you have more than an hour's worth of defects and secrets, think again.  No one is that bad. Don't repeat; don't waffle; don't delay.

The only step you can complete perfectly ...

· original

The only step you can complete perfectly, is it said, is Step One.

I would question this statement.

Step One is an admission. What is a perfect admission? Presumably an admission without any caveat, proviso, or reservation. Certainly, the Big Book says that there must be no reservation whatsoever. So far, so good.

However, what we’re dealing with in Step One is an alcoholic mind. An idea that can be clear, and wholeheartedly accepted, at ten past eleven in the morning can be joined by other, conflicting ideas by four-thirty in the afternoon, and completely displaced by seven in the evening.

The perfect execution of Step One would be such an admission which, 24 hours a day, for the rest of one’s life, remains perfectly untainted by any contradictory or conflicting thought. Frankly, I seriously doubt that anyone in AA has managed to keep their minds clear of any thoughts that contradict or conflict with Step One, for the rest of their lives.

In fact, it’s axiomatic that AAs, even those who are well recovered and decades sober, will exhibit moments (at the very least), if not hours, days, weeks, months, or years, of self-will, thus back-tracking brazenly on the second part of Step One, the admission that ‘we’ (the ‘small s’ self) cannot (successfully) manage our own lives.

Pretty much everyone I have sponsored, when completing Step One, whilst confident to proceed on the basis that its two propositions are true, concedes the presence and allure of stray thoughts. In fact, the presence and allure of such thoughts is precisely the insanity that the remainder of the steps is designed to combat, so one could expect the elimination of such thoughts only in tandem with the completion of the remainder of the Steps. If their permanent and perfect elimination were secured by the mere taking of Step One, the remainder of the steps would not be necessary.

So, my view is that taking Step One perfectly is an ideal, not an attained state.

Can other steps be taken perfectly? Steps Two, Three, and Six are unmeasurable, and Steps Four, Ten, Eleven, and Twelve are open-ended, with almost unlimited possibilities for expansion in time and scope. Let’s cross those off the list of steps that might be taken perfectly.

That leaves us with Five, Seven, Eight, and Nine.

Seven is a good candidate for perfect step-working. It’s a pivot point in the Steps, a one-off moment, and either one has said the prayer sincerely or one has not. So, Step Seven can be worked perfectly (although one might rightly argue that ‘humbly’ has degrees, and that no one is perfectly humble).

Steps Five, Eight, and Nine, provided that we use what in auditing would be called a ‘materiality threshold’, can be completely perfectly, and a failure to do so will likely result in relapse.

When auditors audit a firm’s accounts, they are not looking for every single error; they are looking for errors that result in material misstatement of the accounts. A threshhold is applied, below which errors are ignored as immaterial.

Similarly, in Step Five, every single manifestation of every character defect (in thought, word, and deed) is not trotted out. To do so would be impossible (for reasons of memory alone) and counterproductive: the purpose of the steps is not to stay locked in self-examination but to clear a path to allow God’s power to flow through us into right action on His behalf for our fellows.

A perfect Step Five is one in which the individual conveys all of the character defects she or he has, and character defects, in enumeration, are finite. The St Augustine Prayer Book contains a great listing, and that’s comprehensive but reassuringly finite. Apart from ‘twists of character’, we are to convey ‘dark crannies’ of the past. I take this to be the shameful and difficult secrets. Again, these are finite. If one works down from the worst, one fairly soon arrives at a point where the remaining secrets are merely minor indiscretions, and there is essentially nothing left hiding in the closet that has not in substance been conveyed already.

In practice, therefore, it’s perfectly possible to effect a perfect Step Five.

Similarly, with the judicious application of a materiality threshold, Step Eight is finite, and that sets the bounds of Step Nine: either one has done one’s utmost to set right these wrongs or one has not. The result is measurable, and perfection is thus attainable. The perfection is not one of outcome but effort.

In my case, the threat of relapse did not subside until I had done a reasonably good job on Steps Five, Eight, and Nine, and in particular the entry into the world of the spirit did not occur until, some years later, I completed Steps Five, Eight, and Nine much more satisfactorily, in each case leaving nothing significant inside that was not conveyed and, where applicable, amended.

Choosing someone to hear a Step Five

· original

Whether one chooses one or more people (yes, you can share your Step Five with more than one person, and it is usually beneficial), there are certain criteria to follow in choosing (from pages 74 to 75 of the Big Book, Alcoholics Anonymous):

(1) 'Close-mouthed ...', 'It is important he be able to keep a confidence ...'

Ask someone who can keep secrets.

(2) '... understanding ...', '... that he fully understand and approve what we are driving at ...'

Ask someone who is going to receive and understand, not condemn etc.

There is a caveat, however: the ego will perceive itself under attack due to this process, as it is, in fact, although the attack takes this form: the ego's goals are perceived as fruitless, its conceptual framework, insane, and its effects, null. Someone 'understanding', in this context, is someone who will help us laugh at the false conceptual structure we have used to 'understand' the world and run our lives.

Ask yourself: is it me that is under attack, or is it the ego, the mind-made false images of self and the world it has constructed?

Sometimes people say they feel 'vulnerable' after a Step Five. This may be due to choosing the wrong person (see below, particularly). Or it may be a good sign. If you want to be close to people, you have to make yourself vulnerable, in the sense of being candid. If you have spent years being cagey, out of fear, and you are suddenly candid, you will feel vulnerable. This may be a sign not that you are genuinely vulnerable to attack but that you have historically associated candour with fear. This is a reason not to withhold or cloak the truth but to challenge the belief system giving rise to the fear.

It is important also that the person be well-versed in the Big Book, have taken Step Five himself, and believe in this process.

Spiritual danger lies in taking Step Five with someone who himself is harbouring secrets, other agendas, or is not signed up to this process.

(3) '... friend ...'

Although a sponsor won't usually share the whole of his Step Five back, he may share excerpts. Sharing a Step Five also with friends can often best be done by swapping.

Also, test-drive your potential Step Five listener with various problems in your life. See how he responds. If, over time, his response gives rise to healing or is practically helpful, good: he will likely be helpful in hearing the whole Step Five. If he induces fear, he may be unhealed himself, or you may simply not be ready for what that particular person has to offer. Find someone else.

(4) '... it may be one of our own family, but we cannot disclose anything to our wives or our parents which will hurt them and make them unhappy ...'

This point speaks for itself.

(5) '... that he will not try to change our plan ...'

Sometimes a Step Five hearer, on hearing a Step Five, will suggest other or additional approaches to recovery.

This can be beneficial, e.g. the suggestion of Al-Anon if the person reveals an undealt-with family history of alcoholism and a childhood badly affected by the alcoholic drinking of a parent, but can sometimes create great confusion if what is suggested is not consistent with the programme the individual is currently in the middle of.

Spiritual consent is there with a sponsor, but may not be there (in terms of full-on suggestions and advice) with someone roped in merely to be the witness to the Step Five and to provide a human presence for the process.

* * * * *


If these suggestions are followed, this will maximise the chance of the Step Five being a positive, effective experience.

Preparing to hear a Step Five

· original


The instructions for the actual Step Five in the Big Book are sparse, and there is little advice on what form it takes or how long it lasts:

'… until they told someone else all their life story.' (73:0)

'… a long talk' (75:1)

'We pocket our pride and go to it, illuminating every twist of character, every dark cranny of the past.' (75:2)

In AA in general, the instructions for Step Five are taken to be, 'read out your Step Four'.

A good Step Four takes ten to twenty hours to write, and a good Step Five takes perhaps one or two hours of revelation and discussion. However, in most cases, sponsees, especially on their first Step Four, are unable not to tell long-winded stories or regurgitate endlessly repetitive resentments that differ from each other only in name and time. The Step Five can then drag on for up to a year in some cases, with a couple of hours every Sunday, perhaps. Some Step Fives take all weekend.

What's wrong with a Step Five that lasts 20 or 100 hours?


Firstly, I'm an AA sponsor, not a therapist paid by the hour or a friend. I can spend a couple of hours helping a sponsee understand the exact nature of their wrongs. An additional 18 or 98 hours spent hearing someone repeat the same resentments and character defects over and over provides no marginal benefit to them or me. It is not the most useful way for me to spend my time, nor the most useful way for the sponsee to spend his time.

The purpose of Step Five is to reveal the exact nature of our wrongs and to share them with another person and thereby to admit them to ourselves and to God. The Book does not say, 'share with another person everything that has ever happened to you, everything you have ever thought and felt, and everything you have ever done, right or wrong.' Two hours is enough 'exact nature'. The reference to the whole of one's life story is clearly meant to prompt a summing up of one's life in a 'long talk' of a couple or a few hours, not a months of Sundays—that is certainly not what happened in the early days of AA, when these suggestions were written. The flaw in no one's approach to life (in thought and deed) is so involved that it takes more than two hours or so to isolate. In fact, the exact nature of someone's wrongs can often be nailed in about half an hour.

What would the exact nature of someone's wrongs be? Well, in my case, it would be spending my life running after money, sex, power, and prestige, comfort, thrills, and looks, admiration, validation, and approval, getting frustrated and vindictive when I do not get them, and dropping into disillusionment and disappointment when I do. I have a history of being arrogant, hostile, distrustful, vain, judgemental, critical, cruel, and indifferent to the suffering of others. In short, I trusted self, not God.

Are there exceptions?


Yes. I have engaged in Step Fives that extend over multiple sessions, usually where the individual is several years sober and there is not much of a pre-existing relationship. Then, the Step Five is used as a springboard to talk mostly about corrective measures and how to approach the area of life in question in a spiritual way. In such cases, there're perhaps ten minutes' revelation per session plus fifty minutes' discussion. This is certainly valuable.

What sometimes fails are multiple-session Step Five where the individual simply talks, talks, and talks, and the listener just listens, listens, listens. I've seen individuals merely burrow themselves further into their self-obsessed, warped narratives and fail to achieve that moment when the penny drops and perspective is regained or gained for the first time.

The danger in these instances is that the individual will not see that there are common threads and really quite simple causes behind the plethora of awful situations and decades of distorted and painful thinking. Unless the root causes are found, the individual will continue in delusion in perpetuity. Complexity or long-windedness in a Step Five usually suggests the root cause has not been found.

So, does the detail ever get discussed?


If the sponsee would like to 'share with another person everything that has ever happened to him, everything he has ever thought and felt, and everything he has ever done, right or wrong,' a therapist can be hired or friends can be found. There likely is a need to talk, talk, and talk, but that's what fellowship and the rest of one's life are for. Also, every story will ultimately get retold when the individual acquires sponsees. That is a very good time for telling all the stories, because then the stories, combined with some insight, can prove useful to others.

The detail of what went wrong in past and present relationships will get discussed in detail in a targeted way in Steps Eight and Nine, to work out whether and how to make amends and what the vision of God's will and the sane and sound ideal for such relationship will be in the future.

So, how do you keep Step Five to one–two hours?

When the sponsee is doing Step Four, monitor closely when each column or section is started, to ensure that the responses are concise and to the point. Help the person boil down to the absolute nub of the matter. Look at page 65: there are just a few words on each item. No more than ten–twenty resentments really need examination. Any further resentments will be variations on a theme. A doctor takes a tiny amount of blood to test it, not pints and pints. We're aiming to get to the core reasons why we resent: we have a plan in the seven areas of self (pride, self-esteem, personal and sex relationships, ambitions, security, and pocketbooks), and the world, of course, is not under our control. If you can't see that with twenty, the penny won't drop with fifty. So twenty resentments will do.

When it comes to the fourth column, the questions can also be answered succinctly in relation to the major resentments.

The final inventory, the list of remaining harms not otherwise covered (cf. page 76), can mop up any other harms scratching away at the back of the sponsee's mind.

The fear and sex inventories (if the latter involves grouping relationships into category or type) are pattern-finding inventories anyway, so produce little material.

If the Step Four is kept concise, the Step Five will be short.

Finally: I suggest that the individual pick the top ten most illustrative or exemplary relationships they have had. Perhaps some family, some childhood relationship, a work relationship or two, etc. It is likely that these relationships will be the templates for every other relationship in their life.

And just in case there is anything else, I ask the individual to pray at the end of the Step Five to be shown anything else they need to get off their chest. Usually one or two things come. The rest—the hand baggage as opposed to the heavy luggage—will be revealed later.

Why Step Five is important, as teller, and listener

· original


From pages 56–58, "Storytelling: Imagination and Faith"

"On the day the Baal Shem Tov was dying, he assigned each of his disciples a task to carry on in his name, to do some of his work. When he finished with all of them, he had one more task. He called the last disciple and gave him this task: to go all over Europe to retell the stories he remembered from the Master. The disciple was very disappointed. This was hardly a prestigious job. But the Baal Shem Tov told him that he would not have to do this forever; he would receive a sign when he should stop and then he could live out the rest of his life in ease.
So off he went, and days and months turned into years and years of telling stories until he felt he had told them in every part of the world. Then he heard of a man in Italy, a nobleman in fact, who would pay a gold ducat for each new story told. So the disciple went to Italy to the nobleman's castle. But to his absolute horror he discovered that he had forgotten all the Baal Shem Tov stories! He couldn't remember a single story. He was mortified. But the nobleman was kind and urged him to stay a few days anyway, in the hope that he would eventually remember something.
But the next day and the next he remembered nothing. Finally, on the third day, the disciple protested that he must go, out of sheer embarrassment. But as he was about to leave, oh, yes, suddenly he remembered one story, and this would prove that he indeed did know the great Baal Shem Tov, for he was the only one there when the story happened. And this is the story he remembered.
Once the Baal Shem Tov told him to harness the horses, for they were about to take a trip to Turkey where at this time of the year the streets were decorated for the Christians' Easter festival. The disciple was upset, for it was well known that Jews were not safe during the Christian Holy Week and Easter. They were fair game for the Christians shouting 'God-killers!' And, in fact, it was the custom during the Easter festival to kill one Jew in reparation.
Still, they went. They went into the city and then into the Jewish quarter, where the Jews were all huddled behind their shutters out of fear. They were secluded, waiting till the festival was over and they could go on out into the streets again in safety. So imagine how startled and surprised they were when the Baal Shem Tov stood up and opened all the windows of the house where they were staying. And furthermore he stood there in full view!
And looking through the window he saw the bishop leading the procession. He was arrayed like a prince with gold vestments, silver mitre, and a diamond-studded staff. The Baal Shem Tov told his disciple, 'Go tell the bishop I want to see him.' Was he out of his mind? Did he want to die? But nothing could deter this order, so the disciple went out and went up to the bishop to tell him that the Baal Shem Tov wanted to see him. The bishop seemed frightened and agitated. But he went. He went and was secluded for three hours with the Baal Shem Tov. Then the Master came out and, without saying anything else, told his disciples they were ready to go back home.
As the disciple finished the story, he was about to apologise to the nobleman for the insignificance of the story, when he suddenly noticed the enormous impact the story had on the nobleman. He had dissolved into tears, and, finally, when he could speak, he said, 'Oh, disciple, your story has just saved my soul! You see, I was there that day. I was that bishop. I had descended from a long line of distinguished rabbis, but, one day, during a period of great persecution, I had abandoned the faith and converted to Christianity. The Christians, of course, were so pleased that, in time, they even made me a bishop. And I had accepted everything, even went along with the killing of the Jews each year, until that one year. The night before the festival, I had a terrible dream of the Day of Judgement, and the danger to my soul. So, when you came, the very next day, with a message from the Baal Shem Tov, I knew that I had to go with you.
For three hours, he and I talked. He told me that there still might be hope for my soul. He told me to sell my goods and retire on what was left and live a life of good deeds and holiness. There might still be hope. And his last words to me were these: 'when a man comes to you and tells you your own story, you will know that your sins are forgiven.'
'So I have been asking everyone I knew for stories from the Baal Shem Tov. And I recognised you immediately when you came, and I was happy. But when I saw that all the stories had been taken from you, I recognised God's judgement. Yet now you have remembered one story, my story, and I know now that the Baal Shem Tov has interceded on my behalf, and that God has forgiven me.'
When a man comes to you and tells you your own story, you know that your sins are forgiven. And when you are forgiven, you are healed."

Deserts, wild geese, homecoming

· original

"Time after time newcomers have tried to keep to themselves certain facts about their lives. Trying to avoid this humbling experience, they have turned to easier methods. Almost invariably they got drunk." (72:2, 'Alcoholics Anonymous')
"Have we kept something to ourselves which should be discussed with another person at once?" (86:1)
So, I wake up with thoughts. Bad thoughts. Egoic thoughts. They run like this, "it isn't good enough. You need another X, a bigger Y, a better Z. This is old, old stuff, Tim. You know perfectly well these desires and their related disappointments are never going to go away. You are going to have to suffer them forever, because there is no real solution. If God was going to provide a solution, He would have done so already. Throw your little prayers at me; throw your little Psalms at me; Golden-Key this one all you like, you lightweight, I'll still be here, waiting. And you know that this time it's true. You cannot escape from me."

I'm reminded of a John Berryman poem:

"He stared at ruin. Ruin stared straight back.
He thought they was old friends. ...
... When the papers were lost
rich with pals' secrets, he thought he had the knack
of ruin. Their paths crossed
and once they crossed in jail; they crossed in bed;
and over an unsigned letter their eyes met,
and in an Asian city
directionless & lurchy at two & three,
or trembling to a telephone's fresh threat, ...
But he noted now that: they were not old friends.
He did not know this one.
This one was a stranger, come to make amends
for all the imposters, and to make it stick."
Every time my ego is on the attack (pretending, as usual, to be protecting my best interests, so I will listen), it attempts to convince me that this time is my High Noon, this time is my Waterloo, this time is the time of my final and irrevocable undoing.

Anyway, it's about 6.55 a.m. at this point. 'Lurchy' (like John Berryman, who, incidentally, was an alcoholic—you don't say!), I stumble to the kettle, and get a text. "You OK?" it says. Naturally, my ego uses this against me, saying, "obviously your egoic crap is now visible to everyone: that's how out of control this has got." The person, we'll call him 'Jack', wants to call.

I've been taught in AA always to take calls, always to answer the phone, always to let into my life the people God brings to me, and, if I allow the Spirit to guide me, no harm can ever come to me or the other person.

So I take the call.

And it's an amend for something that never happened. OK, the situation happened—every word he related of the events in question was true, but the perception of those events was totally distorted, and the interpretation of that perception, quite flawed. I reassured him that there was absolutely nothing to make amends to me for, and that, although I had noticed the situation in question, it was like throwing dried peas against a wall (as the Russians say), and I was not remotely affected. We were both laughing hysterically by this point at the distortion in his perception. We could both hear the distinctive sound of the ego deflating.

Then it occurred to me.

This is the reason why AA works.

This is someone with a very strong programme. Very few amends left. Lots of service. Lots of sponsees. A very strong prayer and meditation life. A shining example of the programme. And yet totally capable of waking up in the morning crippled with delusion.

If that is true for this man, whom I deeply respect, is that not going to be true for me too?

I could not possibly maintain the double-standard that, whilst his egoic fears are substanceless, mine are real.

The truth started to peep through: whatever is negative is founded in untruth and delusion. Whatever is fearful is founded in untruth and delusion. Whatever is Godless is founded in untruth and delusion.

And what is true for others is true for me; what is true for me is true for others.

In the moment of seeing his delusion for what it was, I saw mine, and, in the moment of seeing mine, I saw his. What I see in others is what I see in me. And what I see in me is what I see in others.

You will learn the full meaning of "Love thy neighbour as thyself." (153:0)

In loving him, in having compassion for him, I am healed.

In AA, physician and patient, therapist and patient are one. There is no distinction in the roles. It is impossible to heal without being healed of precisely that which is being healed in the other.

The AA programme is, indeed, incredibly simple. Admission of defeat, inventory, confession, restitution, reliance on God, helping others.
"You do not have to be good.
You do not have to walk on your knees
for a hundred miles through the desert, repenting.
You only have to let the soft animal of your body
love what it loves. Tell me about despair, yours, and I will tell you mine." (Mary Oliver)
More miracles happen in my life through the simple revelation of the truth than anything. And the truth, often, is the presence of delusion in my mind, which blocks my heart.
"Meanwhile the wild geese, high in the clean blue air,
are heading home again.
Whoever you are, no matter how lonely,
the world offers itself to your imagination,
calls to you like the wild geese, harsh and exciting—
over and over announcing your place
in the family of things" (Mary Oliver)
Once the truth of the lies has been revealed, the smoke lifts, and the True World reveals itself. That is the moment my place in the Family of Things is announced. That is the moment I come Home.

We are blessed.

Step off the ghost train

· original

"Is it not because each wants to play the lead?" (122:2)
The 'actor' metaphor runs through and beyond the first 164 pages of the book 'Alcoholics Anonymous'. We have the actor trying to play the director but producing confusion and harmony, and we have the actor who thinks he is the chief critic in one of the stories.
But there is another aspect to this metaphor which is not discussed so often.
I am the actor, not the part.                                                                        
That means you are the actor, not the part, too.
Sounds pretty obvious, really.
Except: do I believe that the drama that can go on in my mind is real? It produces emotions, just like the emotions I will feel when watching a film at the cinema, which can be so visceral, I feel sick or frightened or whatever, in a genuine physical sense. The mind is the ultimate source of my behaviour and emotions. Even though there may an external stimulus, my mind has to be receptive for that stimulus for the train of dominos to start falling.
What I experience, when I am in the middle of the drama, is these 'real' emotions, and, because the emotions 'feel' real, and I can point to external stimuli—your criticism, your actions, your drama—I judge the drama itself to be real. I am no longer the actor—I am the lead part, so engrossed in the role that I have forgotten who I am.
Before I came to AA—and for years afterwards—I was on a ghost train. Strapped in, totally absorbed in the horror, shuttled from one ghoulish 'experience' to another, the whole time bedevilled by sets of emotions prompted not by the cardboard, neon-painted demons and cobwebbed skeletons flashing up before my eyes but because of what I thought they represented. Thought.
"Therefore, the main problem of the alcoholic centers in his mind, rather than in his body." (23:1)
My problem rests not in my life but in my perception.
"So our troubles, we think, are basically of our own making." (62:2)
What is worse is that, once I realise this, that my thoughts are the problem, I become so identified with my thoughts I cannot choose otherwise.
"So we think cheerfulness and laughter make for usefulness. Outsiders are sometimes shocked when we burst into merriment over a seemingly tragic experience out of the past." (132:2)
"A man may criticize or laugh at himself and it will affect others favorably, but criticism or ridicule coming from another often produces the contrary effect." (125:2)
Laughter at myself takes me from being the lead in the drama to being the observer of the drama. At first, I can still feel the heat of the fire, but, as I gain more and more distance, I realise how unreal every aspect of the drama is.
"... a strenuous effort to face, and to be rid of, the things in ourselves which had been blocking us." (64:0)
"We have been trying ... to discover the obstacles in our path." (72:1)
"If we still cling to something we will not let go, we ask God to help us be willing." (76:1)
Step Four and Five, according to the Big Book, have as their purpose the identification not of who and what I am but the identification of everything that I am not.
I am not that which blocks me.
I am not the obstacles in my path.
If something can be let go of, it was never 'me' in the first place—it was something I acquired and wrongly identified myself with.
I did not learn this principle for a very long time in AA, and feel very fortunate to have learned it now.
I have been down paths since coming to AA which, rather than releasing me from the drama by showing me I am the observer of the drama, not the drama, deepened my identification with it.
I have seen brilliant therapists and psychoanalysts. The purpose of the therapy and psychoanalysis was understanding, liberation, and change.
The result—and I in no way blame the therapists or therapies—was this: I became so identified with my thinking patterns, my childhood suffering, my neurotic reactions to life originating in a past I had no control over that abandonment of self (the fabricated drama) was then unthinkable. Whenever freedom loomed, I would 'remember' the past hurts and humiliations and bring them into my present and they would become my filter for reality in that moment. The information learned in therapy was invaluable. For me, it was not, however, enough.
I am so grateful to the people in AA who have shown me how to dis-identify with the tons of junkyard garbage. The process has been simple:
(1) catalogue the thinking and behaviour to be discarded (Step Four)
(2) discuss with other people (Step Five)—not as wounded heroes but as dispassionate, amused observers
(3) forgiveness of everyone and everything
(4) amends to everyone I have hurt
(5) reliance on God in thought and action
The purpose: abandonment of self, whatever the form.
And, on a good day, I step off the ghost train and out of the 'funfair' and stride into world.

↑ Step 5 contents